Web browser duckduckgo9/27/2023 I guess I might be one of the few people here who actually have been regulated under the GDPR by a supervising authority. Oh, and the fact I'm downvoted for a purely informational comment additionally does not shine a good light on DDG. "Natural persons may be associated with online identifiers provided by their devices, applications, tools and protocols, such as internet protocol addresses, cookie identifiers or other identifiers such as radio frequency identification tags." The transmission of ip address alone, which is necessary for the TCP request to happen, deanonymizes the request enough to not be considered anonymous within the GDPR framework.Īdequate, relevant and limited to what is necessary in relation to the purposes for which they are processed (‘data minimisation’) " - this is the "Datensparsamkeit" you mentioned.Įxceptions from Article 7 do not apply: The user has to give wilfully give informed consent, which he cannot do as the privacy policy of the browser omits the information that all visited domains are transmitted to DDG servers. It does not matter that they say they do not collect the information, it is enough it is unnecessarily sent to their servers to make the whole function illegal. In fact I think what they do here is illegal by GDPR. I haven't looked at Firefox and Safari but I assume they do something similar. Here's the schema:ĬREATE TABLE meta(key LONGVARCHAR NOT NULL UNIQUE PRIMARY KEY, value LONGVARCHAR) ĬREATE TABLE icon_mapping(id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,page_url LONGVARCHAR NOT NULL,icon_id INTEGER) ĬREATE TABLE favicons(id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,url LONGVARCHAR NOT NULL,icon_type INTEGER DEFAULT 1) ĬREATE TABLE favicon_bitmaps(id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,icon_id INTEGER NOT NULL,last_updated INTEGER DEFAULT 0,image_data BLOB,width INTEGER DEFAULT 0,height INTEGER DEFAULT 0,last_requested INTEGER DEFAULT 0) ĬREATE INDEX icon_mapping_page_url_idx ON icon_mapping(page_url) ĬREATE INDEX icon_mapping_icon_id_idx ON icon_mapping(icon_id) ĬREATE INDEX favicons_url ON favicons(url) ĬREATE INDEX favicon_bitmaps_icon_id ON favicon_bitmaps(icon_id) on macOS it's ~/Library/Application Support/Google/Chrome//Favicons). There's SQLite3 database named Favicons in your profile directory (e.g. That is not the case with this faveicon telemetry endpoint.Ĭhrome, according to my understanding, hardcodes a few favicon URLs for builtin search engines, and caches everything else on site visit. To be a strong privacy browser you could consider what it would take to be “NSL proof” such that if handed a national security letter with gag order, you cannot comply. Privacy policies are a patch for insufficient privacy engineering. ISP or nation state firewall operators who are certainly not bound by your ‘just trust us’ privacy policy. The fact this browser connects to that endpoint reveals demographics (choice of privacy browser) and behaviors (when and how much web surfing) to e.g. You’re leaking browser usage telemetry to every single party to that traffic - the source IP address PII you mention is in unencrypted metadata. You knowing it means others can know it if you break trust or are required to comply with authorities.Īnd regardless of end-to-end encryption, that this user is phoning home to your fave icon endpoint, when, and from what IP, is revealed to every ISP in the chain. Most normals think of collect as become known not as permanently store. To be more clear, your staff, and you, have said PII ‘like IP addresses’, and have said ‘thrown away’ some places and ‘not collected’ others.Ĭontrary to this framing, it’s not possible to not incidentally become aware of every single browser users’ usage timing and user IP addresses if the browsers are phoning home this way - a colloquial understanding of ‘collect’, not the James Clapper NSA dodge definition of ‘collect’.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |